Absolute and Relative Identity
For those of us wishing to protect our privacy upon the open circuits that so dominate the Internet, absolute identity is not a choice. We prefer relative identity.
The basic doctrine of relative identity states that - All I need to know about you is that you are not me! And visa versa.
Relative identity works fine for two people. But what do you do when it's time to expand? If three people are to identify themselves relatively there is an immediate problem. A and B both know that they are not the other but neither knows that C is not the other.
Absolute identity is only as credible as the other absolute identities that are associated with it. In other words, I am suppose to believe your absolute identity because it is confirmed by another supposed absolute identity. Of course, I only need to continue tracing the line back and we will find that the genealogy is not rooted in an absolute identity. It must be rooted in the first pair who recognized the relative identity of each. The one looked at the other and thought "You are not me." And that was a very correct judgement.
Relative identity allows users the freedom to be whoever they want to be, enabling them to use any mode that they want to use, including the expository, narrative and dramatic modes.
Michael Welsh video 56:00
What is a Community?
When is a Community?
Why is a Community?
Where is a Community?
How is a Community?
Register here for the Discussion Workshop Blog
What is a Community?
When is a Community?
Why is a Community?
Where is a Community?
How is a Community?
Register here for the Discussion Workshop Blog
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.